|Year : 2010 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 87-93
Investigation of chromosomal aberrations in Egyptian hepatocellular carcinoma patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization
Magdy S Aly1, Abeer A Bahnassy2, Zekri N Abdel-Rahman3
1 Biological Science Department, Faculty of Science, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia,
2 Tissue Culture Unit., Pathology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt,
3 Virology and Immunology Unit, Cancer Biology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt,
|Date of Web Publication||16-Sep-2010|
Magdy S Aly
Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Egypt
| Abstract|| |
Background and Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a very common and highly malignant tumor, associated mainly with chronic viral hepatitis, cirrhosis of any cause, aflatoxin exposure and ethanol consumption. Cytogenetic analysis on HCC has been limited because of poor hepatocyte growth in vitro. Conventional cytogenetic studies have demonstrated frequent abnormalities of specific chromosomes in HCC. Molecular cytogenetic approaches have been applied only rarely in the characterization of HCC. The main aim of this study was to evaluate genetic aberrations of different chromosomes in HCC. The study included 35 patients with HCC, who have been diagnosed and treated at National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt. The clinico-pathologic features of the studied patient were collected from patient's files.
Materials and Methods: Interphase cytogenetics by fluorescence in situ hybridization with the use of a panel of centromere-associated DNA probes for chromosomes 1, 4, 8, 9, 13, 17, 20 and Y were performed on paraffin-embedded HCC specimens.
Results: The most common chromosomal aberrations detected were gain of chromosomes 8 in 12 cases (34.28%), 17 in 6 cases (17.14%). Loss of chromosome Y was detected in 6 of male cases (30%). Monosomy 4 was also detected in 5 cases (14.28%). Negative correlation could be detected only between chromosome 4 and 8. (r = -0.381, P < 0.05). Correlations between gain or loss of chromosomes and the different clinicopathologic parameters in the patients investigated, indicated negative correlation between: chromosome Y and age and chromosome 1 and cirrhosis.
Conclusion: Gains and losses of DNA found in this study probably involve oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes that play a role in the puzzle of hepatocarcinogenesis.
Keywords: Chromosomes, genetics, hepatocellular carcinoma, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization, liver cancer
|How to cite this article:|
Aly MS, Bahnassy AA, Abdel-Rahman ZN. Investigation of chromosomal aberrations in Egyptian hepatocellular carcinoma patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Indian J Hum Genet 2010;16:87-93
|How to cite this URL:|
Aly MS, Bahnassy AA, Abdel-Rahman ZN. Investigation of chromosomal aberrations in Egyptian hepatocellular carcinoma patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Indian J Hum Genet [serial online] 2010 [cited 2013 May 24];16:87-93. Available from: http://www.ijhg.com/text.asp?2010/16/2/87/69370
| Introduction|| |
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most common malignancies worldwide. At present, approximately 550,000 new patients are diagnosed with HCC each year worldwide. However, regional differences in the incidence of HCC are significant. The highest prevalence is found in southeast Asia and the sub-Saharan Africa, mostly due to the high rates of chronic viral hepatitis, a high risk factor for HCC. Additional causes leading to HCC are alcohol, toxins such as aflatoxin, hemochromatosis, α1-antitrypsin deficiency, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). ,,,,
Yet, little is known about the molecular pathogenesis of HCC. In fact, the majority of HCC are associated with a background of chronic liver disease. Therefore, hepatocarcinogenesis is believed to be a long-term process that involves multiple genetic alterations.
Chromosome aberrations are a hallmark of solid tumors and it has been known for decades that chromosome rearrangements exist in most, if not all, human tumors. Additionally, cytogenetic study followed by molecular analysis of recurring chromosome changes has greatly facilitated the identification of crucial oncogenes and tumor suppressors.
Cytogenetic studies such as comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have demonstrated characteristic chromosomal aberrations in conventional HCCs. ,,,,,,,,, The earliest changes are gains at chromosomal arms 1q and 8q. , Other common abnormalities that occur during tumor progression are gains at 6q, 7q, 20q and X, and losses at 4q, 8p, 13q, 16q and 17p. ,,,,,,,,, Some of these chromosomal changes show distinct clinicopathologic associations. Elevated alpha-fetoprotein levels and p53 mutations correlate with loss of 4q.  Gains of 8q and 20q have been observed in large tumors. HCCs arising in noncirrhotic liver often show gain of 8q and loss of 13q. Losses of 3q, 9p and 6q may be independent predictors of unfavorable outcome.
Frequent non-random chromosomal gains and losses detected by CGH are gains of 1q, 6p, 8q, 17q, and 20q, and losses of 1p, 4q, 5q, 6q, 8p, 9p, 10q, 13q, 16q, 17p, 19p, and 22q. In addition, the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) assay is used to define chromosomal regions with allelic deletions, and results revealed that LOH was frequently detected in 1p, 4q, 6q, 8p, 13q, 16q, and 17p. ,, These studies suggest the presence of multiple oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes in regions of recurrent gain or loss, respectively.
FISH is the technique that can be used to detect genetic alterations in either metaphase or interphase nuclei by appropriate probes. Interphase FISH is especially suitable for the analysis of tumor samples that are difficult to culture or that contain significant normal background cells, because it requires only intact nuclei and is evaluated on a single-cell level. So far, only few reports of interphase FISH study on HCC have been found in the literature and none of them had selected chromosomes 4, 9 as their target regions. These centromere probes are useful for aneuploid study. ,,,,,,
However, data on correlation of these chromosomal aberrations with the clinical course of the disease are not available, mostly due to the limited overall number of the comparatively large chromosomal aberrations and to the especially low occurrence of the same aberration within the same collective patients.
The main aim of this study was to evaluate the copy number changes in Egyptian patients with HCC. We applied FISH with (peri-) centromeric DNA probes specific for chromosomes 1, 4, 8, 9, 13, 17, 20 and Y to 35 liver tumor samples from Egyptian patients. The results were examined in relation to clinicopathologic findings to elucidate the numerical chromosomal aberrations implicated in tumor progression.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Patients and samples
The study included 35 patients with HCC, who have been diagnosed and treated at National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt. No preoperative radiation therapy or chemotherapy was administered to any of the patients.
Five micron thick, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of the tumor were examined in all 35 cases. Sections were deparaffinized in xylene twice for 10 minutes, dehydrated with 100% ethanol.
In situ hybridization
FISH experiments were carried out with centromeric probes for chromosomes 1, 4, 8, 9, 13, 17, 20 and Y in all 35 patients (Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany). Pepsin digestion (99 ml of distilled water, 1 ml of 1 M HCl, and 5 mg of pepsin) for 3 minutes at room temperature was followed by washing for 1 minute in distilled water and incubation for 10 minutes in paraformaldehyde (1.5%). After washing for 1 minute in distilled water and drying the slides, 0.5 μl of each chromosome in 10 μl of hybridization buffer (Abbott) was pipetted onto the slide, placed under a glass coverslip, sealed with rubber cement, heated to 80°C for 10 minutes, and incubated overnight at 37°C in a humidified chamber. The coverslip was removed, and the slides were washed twice in 0.4Χ SSC and 0.3% Tween 20 at 75°C for 2 minutes. Counterstaining was done with 5 μl of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (40 ng/ml (Qiagen, Heidelberg, Germany). Evaluation of signals was carried out by using an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon) equipped with specific filters and a 100-W mercury lamp. To determine the cut-off levels for the detection of numerical chromosomal aberrations by using centromere-specific probes for all the chromosomes used, 2000 peripheral blood lymphocytes (i.e., 400 cells each from five healthy donors with normal karyotypes) and 2000 normal hepatocytes from liver cell aspirates of five patients with regenerative nodules and/or fatty changes were analyzed. According to Ward et al, the thresholds for gains and losses of the respective chromosomes were calculated as the mean ± 3SD.
Statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test, and the Mantel-Haenszel rank test for trend.
| Results|| |
The study included 35 patients with HCC, who have been diagnosed and treated at National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt. The charts of the patients were reviewed to retrieve their clinicopathologic data. They were 20 males and 15 females with a male:female ratio of 1:3. Their ages ranged between 33 and 80 years (median 55 years).
The major characteristics and clinicopathologic data of the patients are summarized in [Table 1].
Determination of cut-off levels
Analysis of 2000 cells from peripheral blood lymphocytes of healthy donors, with centromere-specific probes for chromosomes 1, 4, 8, 9, 13, 17 and 20 showed one signal in 2.25-3.10% of the cells (SD 1.08-1.74%) and three or more signals in 0.35 and 1.20% of cells (SD 0.29-0.78%). Thus, the cut-off levels (mean ± 3SD) were determined as 6.15-7.48% for losses and 1.21-3.14% for gains.
Analysis of 2000 normal hepatocytes from five liver aspirates with the probes mentioned above showed one signal in 2.40-3.20% of the cells (SD 0.63-1.55%) and three or more signals in 1.3-1.65% of the cells (SD 0.29-0.57%). The cut-off levels (mean ± 3SD) were determined as 4.28-7.84% for losses and 2.41-3.26% for gains. The percentage of tetrasomic cells was <1.75%.
FISH was successful in all the cases studied. Most of the probes displayed a diploid spot distribution. [Table 2] and [Figure 1] summarize the FISH results for each of the 35 patients with numerical chromosomal aberrations. The most common chromosomal aberrations detected were gain of chromosomes 1 in 4 cases (11.42%), 8 in 12 cases (34.28%), 17 in 6 cases (17.14%). Loss of chromosome Y was detected in six of the male cases (30%). Monosomies of chromosomes 4, 8, 9, 13, and 17 were also detected in 5 (14.28%), 3 (8.57%), 2 (5.71%), 4 (11.42%) and 3 cases (8.57%), respectively.
|Table 2: Number and percentage of patients with gain or loss of the different chromosomes|
Click here to view
|Figure 1: Number of patients with gain or loss of the different chromosomes|
Click here to view
[Table 3] shows the intercorrelations between gain and/or loss of chromosomes in the patients investigated. Negative correlation could be detected only between chromosomes 4 and 8 (r = −0.381, P < 0.05).
|Table 3: Intercorrelations between gain or loss of chromosomes in the patients investigated|
Click here to view
[Table 4] demonstrates the correlations between gain or loss of chromosomes and the different clinicopathologic parameters in the patients investigated. Negative correlation could be detected between chromosome Y and age, as well as between chromosome 1 and cirrhosis.
|Table 4: Correlations between gain or loss of chromosomes and the different clinicopathologic parameters in the patients investigated|
Click here to view
None of the other clinicopathologic parameters including sex, percentage of tumor cells, Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Chronic Active Hepatitis (CAH) and grade, had a statistically significant correlation with the presence or absence of any of the numerical chromosomal aberrations observed in this study.
| Discussion|| |
Knowledge about cytogenetic alterations in HCC has increased over the past few years due to the application of new techniques such as CGH and FISH. Larger numbers of HCC have now been analyzed, and recurrent patterns of chromosomal imbalances have been identified. ,, In particular, imbalances of chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, and X, including total and partial gains and losses, have been demonstrated. Although not all of these aberrations were detectable in every case analyzed, at least some of them were found in varying combinations in all the HCC cases described. In this study, we used FISH as an alternative method to CGH to analyze HCC. The main reason for this approach was that FISH is easier to perform and much easier to evaluate than CGH is. Whereas CGH requires a karyotype analysis similar to conventional cytogenetics, FISH requires only the counting of single signal spots in the nuclei. Therefore, the correct identification of chromosomes, which requires a lot of experience, is not mandatory in FISH.
Centromeric probes most often give brighter signals than probes localized on the arms of the chromosomes. Evaluation of the signals can be done by epifluorescence microscopy with a standard filter set, without the need for sophisticated technical equipment.
The aneuploidy found by the panel of probes is seen not only in HCC but also in a variety of other malignant tumors affecting the same chromosomes in similar patterns, as summarized by Mitelman et al.  Lengauer et al.  discussed these findings as an increased genetic instability, based on the inability of the aberrant cell to control chromosomal alterations. This assumption is underscored by the observation that the chromosome changes found in distinct carcinomas are not always identical for all chromosomes. The mechanisms responsible for this genetic instability are not yet known and require further investigation.
Molecular genetic analyses have identified the loss of heterozygosity at many loci in HCCs with the high frequencies at 1p, 4q, 11p, 13q, 16q and 17p. ,,,,,
The basic technique for the detection of chromosomal imbalances is the classic cytogenetic examination (CG). For CG, tumor cells are cultivated in vitro with subsequent preparation of metaphases or chromosomes. Cell culture results in selective cell growth and secondary changes in chromosomal material. CG is difficult to perform in solid tumors such as HCC. Until now, about 20 primary HCC or HCC cell lines have been investigated cytogenetically. Recurrent aberrations of chromosomes 1q, 4q, 6q, 8p, 8q, 16p and 17 have been found. ,,, Due to these limitations, CG cannot be recommended for diagnostic purposes.
The purpose of our study was to characterize numerical aberrations of certain chromosomes during hepatocarcinogenesis. This study was useful in identifying sequential genetic events associated with the progression of HCC. However, characterization of the cytogenetic pathway to hepatocarcinogenesis will require examination of both borderline lesions and small carcinomas because the earliest genetic events responsible for disease development have likely been overshadowed by the numerous genetic abnormalities present in advanced carcinomas.
In our study, we used a panel of centromere-associated DNA probes for chromosomes 1, 4, 8, 9, 13, 17, 20 and Y on paraffin-embedded HCC specimens from Egyptian patients.
So far, only a few reports of interphase FISH study on HCC have been found in the literature. ,,,,,, Huang et al.,  using centromeric probes for chromosomes 3, 4, 6, 8 and 9, showed at least one deletion or aneuploidy for chromosomes 4 and 8. Hamon-Benais et al. demonstrated numerical changes in chromosomes 7, 17 and 20 in all six HCCs examined. Trisomy 1 and 8 has been frequently encountered in HCCs.  The numerical abnormalities of chromosome 17 were associated with increased histologic grade and proliferative activity.  Numerical chromosome aberrations occurred in HCC from early-stage patients and became more prominent with severe histologic grades and tumor progression. 
In our series, the most common chromosomal aberrations detected were gain of chromosomes 8 in 12 cases (34.28%) and 17 in 6 cases (17.14%). Loss of chromosome Y was detected in six of the male cases (30%). Monosomy 4 was also detected in five cases (14.28%). Negative correlation could be detected only between chromosomes 4 and 8. (r = −0.381, P < 0.05). Our results in Egyptian patients are in agreement with those of other reports. Huang et al.  described frequent allelic loss at 4q21, 8p22, and 6q14 by FISH, using yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) probes in 17 cases of HCC. Frequent deletion on 4q and 8p in HCC has been reported by various studies using microsatellite polymorphism, and in one study using comparative genomic hybridization. ,,,, This indicated that loss or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in these loci may play a major role in the development of HCC. Other chromosomal sites that have been reported to be deleted in HCC include 1p, 5q, 6q,10q, 11p, 16q, 17p and 22q. ,,
In conclusion , we have demonstrated the utility of FISH technique in evaluating HCC clonal cytogenetic aberrations. Implantation of extended panels of FISH probes will provide a mechanism complementary to allelic imbalance (loss of heterozygosity) analysis for the characterization of specific regions. Gains and losses of DNA found in this study probably involve oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes that play a role in the puzzle of hepatocarcinogenesis.
| References|| |
|1.||Motola-Kuba D, Zamora-Valdes D, Uribe M, Mendez-Sanchez N. Hepatocellular carcinoma. An overview. Ann Hepatol 2006;5:16-24. |
|2.||McGlynn KA, London WT. Epidemiology and natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2005;19:3-23. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|3.||Srivatanakul P, Sriplung H, Deerasamee S. Epidemiology of liver cancer: An overview. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2004;5:118-25. [PUBMED] |
|4.||Teo EK, Fock KM. Hepatocellular carcinoma: An Asian perspective. Dig Dis 2001;19:263-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|5.||Clark JM. The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adults. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40:S5-10. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|6.||Rashid A, Wang JS, Qian GS, Lu BX, Hamilton SR, Groopman JD. Genetic alterations in hepatocellular carcinomas: Association between loss of chromosome 4q and p53 gene mutations. Br J Cancer 1999;80:59-66. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|7.||Wong N, Lai P, Lee SW, Fan S, Pang E, Liew CT, et al. Assessment of genetic changes in hepatocellular carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization analysis: Relationship to disease stage, tumor size, and cirrhosis. Am J Pathol 1999;154:37-43. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|8.||Zondervan PE, Wink J, Alers JC, IJzermans JN, Schalm SW, de Man RA, et al. Molecular cytogenetic evaluation of virus-associated and nonviral hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of 26 carcinomas and 12 concurrent dysplasias. J Pathol 2000;192:207-15. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|9.||Laurent-Puig P, Legoix P, Bluteau O, Belghiti J, Franco D, Binot F, et al. Genetic alterations associated with hepatocellular carcinomas define distinct pathways of hepatocarcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1763-73. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|10.||Guan XY, Fang Y, Sham JS, Kwong DL, Zhang Y, Liang Q, et al. Recurrent chromosome alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2001;30:110-6. |
|11.||Balsara BR, Pei J, De Rienzo A, Simon D, Tosolini A, Lu YY, et al. Human hepatocellular carcinoma is characterized by a highly consistent pattern of genomic imbalances, including frequent loss of 16q23.1-24.1. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2001;30:245-53. |
|12.||Rao UN, Gollin SM, Beaves S, Cieply K, Nalesnik M, Michalopoulos GK. Comparative genomic hybridization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlation with fluorescence in situ hybridization in paraffin-embedded tissue. Mol Diagn 2001;6:27-37. [PUBMED] |
|13.||Wilkens L, Bredt M, Flemming P, Schwarze Y, Becker T, Mengel M, et al. Diagnostic impact of fluorescence in situ hybridization in the differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and welldifferentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Mol Diagn 2001;3:68-73. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|14.||Moinzadeh P, Breuhahn K, Stόtzer H, Schirmacher P. Chromosome alterations in human hepatocellular carcinomas correlate with aetiology and histological grade-results of an explorative CGH meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2005;92:935-41. |
|15.||Poon TC, Wong N, Lai PB, Rattray M, Johnson PJ, Sung JJ. A tumor progression model for hepatocellular carcinoma: Bioinformatic analysis of genomic data. Gastroenterology 2006;131:1262-70. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|16.||Nasarek A, Werner M, Nolte M, Klempnauer J, Georgii A. Trisomy 1 and 8 occur frequently in hepatocellular carcinoma but not in liver cell adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: A fluorescence in situ hybridization study. Virchows Arch 1995;427:373-8. [PUBMED] |
|17.||Kimura H, Kagawa K, Deguchi T, Nakajima T, Kakushi M, Okawara T, et al. Cytogenetic analyses of hepatocellular carcinoma by in situ hybridization with a chromosome-specific DNA probe. Cancer 1996;77:271-7. |
|18.||Hamon-Benais C, Ingster O, Terris B, Couturier-Turpin MH, Berheim A, Feldmann G. Interphase cytogenetic studies of human hepatocellular carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hepatology 1996;23:429-35. |
|19.||Kato A, Kubo K, Kurokawa F, Okita K, Oga A, Murakami T. Numerical aberrations of chromosomes 16, 17, and 18 in hepatocellular carcinoma: A FISH and FCM analysis of 20 cases. Digest Dis Sci 1998;43:1-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|20.||Terris B, Ingster O, Rubbia L, Dubois S, Belghiti J, Feldmann G, et al. Interphase cytogenetic ananlysis reveals numerical chromosome aberrations in large liver cell dysplasia. J Hepatol 1997;27:313-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|21.||Ohasawa N, Sakamoto M, Saito T, Kobayashi M, Hirohashi S. Numerical chromosome aberrations in hepatocellular carcinoma detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Hepatol 1996;25:655-62. |
|22.||Huang SF, Hsu HC, Fletcher JA. Investigation of chromosomal aberrations in hepatocellular carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1999;111:21-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|23.||Ward BE, Gersen SL, Carelli MP, McGuire NM, Dackowski WR, Weinstein M, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: Clinical experience with 4,500 specimens. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:854-65. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|24.||Wong N, Lai P, Lee SW, Fan S, Pang E, Liew CT, et al. Assessment of genetic changes in hepatocellular carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization analysis. Am J Pathol 1999;154:37-43. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|25.||Kusano N, Shirashi K, Kubo K, Oga A, Okita K, Sasaki K. Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization in hepatocellular carcinomas: Their relationship to clinicopathological features. Hepatology 1999;29:1858-62. |
|26.||Zimonjic DB, Keck CL, Thorgeirsson SS, Popescu N. Novel recurrent genetic imbalances in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines identified by comparative genomic hybridization. Hepatology 1999;29:1208-14. |
|27.||Mitelman F, Mertens F, Johansson B. A breakpoint map of recurrent chromosomal rearrangements in human neoplasia. Nat Genet 1997;15:417-74. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|28.||Lengauer CL, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancer. Nature 1998;396:643-9. |
|29.||Oda T, Tsuda H, Scarpa A, Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S. Mutation pattern of the p53 gene as a diagnostic marker for multiple hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 1992;52:3674-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|30.||Yeh SH, Chen PJ, Chen HL, Lai MY, Wang CC, Chen DS. Frequent genetic alterations at the distal region of chromosome 1p in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Cancer Res 1994;54:4188-92. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|31.||Zhang X, Xu HJ, Murakami Y, Sachse R, Yashima K, Hirohashi S, et al. Deletions of chromosome 13q, mutations in retinoblastoma 1, and retinoblastoma protein state in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 1994;54:4177-82. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|32.||Tsuda H, Oda T, Sakamoto M, Setsuo H. Different pattern of chromosomal allele loss in multiple hepatocellular carcinomas as evidence of their multifocal origin. Cancer Res 1992;52:1504-9. |
|33.||Nishida N, Fukuda Y, Kokuryu H, Sadamoto T, Isowa G, Honda K, et al. Accumulation of allelic loss on arms of chromosomes 13q, 16q and 17p in the advanced stages of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1992;51:862-8. [PUBMED] |
|34.||Walker JG, Heyward NK, Falvey S, Cooksley WG. Loss of somatic heterozygosity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 1991;51:4367-70. |
|35.||Pang E, Wong N, Lai PB, To KF, Lau JW, Johnson PJ. Consistent chromosome 10 rearrangements in four newly established human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2002;33:150-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|36.||Lowichik A, Schneider NR, Tonk V, Ansari MQ, Timmons CF. Report of a complex karyotype in recurrent metastatic fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma and a review of hepatocellular carcinoma cytogenetics. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1996;88:170-4. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|37.||Bardi G, Johansson B, Pandis N, Heim S, Mandahl N, Andren SA, et al. Cytogenetic findings in three primary hepatocellular carcinomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1992;58:191-5. |
|38.||Simon D, Knowles BB, Weith A. Abnormalities of chromosome 1 and loss of heterozygosity on 1p in primary hepatomas. Oncogene 1991;6:765-70. [PUBMED] |
|39.||Ohasawa N, Sakamoto M, Saito T, Kobayashi M, Hirohashi S. Numerical chromosome aberrations in hepatocellular carcinoma detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Hepatol 1996;25:655-62. |
|40.||Huang SF, Hsu HC, Cheng YM, Chang TC. Allelic loss at chromosome band 6q14 correlates with favorable prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2000;116:23-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|41.||Yeh SH, Chen PJ, Lai MY, Chen DS. Allelic loss on chromosomes 4q and 16q in hepatocellular carcinoma: association with elevated alpha-fetoprotein production. Gastroenterology 1996;110:184-92. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|42.||Emi M, Fujiwara Y, Ohata H, Tsuda H, Hirohashi S, Koike M, et al. Allelic loss at chromosome band 8p21.3-p22 is associated with progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1993;7:152-7. [PUBMED] |
|43.||Boige V, Laurent-Puig P, Fouchet P, Flejou JF, Monges G, Bedossa P, et al. Concerted nonsyntenic allellic losses in hyperploid hepatocellular carcinoma as determined by a high-resolution allelotype. Cancer Res 1997;57:1986-90. |
|44.||Nagai H, Pineau P, Tiollais P, Buendia MA, Dejean A. Comprehensive allelotyping of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 1997;14:2927-33. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|45.||Marchio A, Meddeb M, Pineau P, Danglot G, Tiollais P, Bernheim A, et al. Recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in hepatocellular carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997;18:59-65. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]