Indian Journal of Human Genetics
Home Current Issue Archives Guidelines Subscriptions e-Alerts Login 
Users online: 18
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 1995  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 46-55

A Deficit Of Parental Consanguinity In Some Autosomal Recessive Diseases


,

Correspondence Address:
Sarah Bundey


Login to access the Email id


Get Permissions

The observation of a deficit of a consanguineous parents in diseases thought to be inherited as autosomal recessives is as intriguing as a deficit of affected sibs. There are several possible explanations. The most likely is that new dominant mutations account for a proportion of patients, and this probably applies to all three diseases here. This explanation would also explain the reduced segregation in sibs. The second explanation is the most interesting, namely that neighbouring alleles are lethal in the homozygous state. This would lead to the non-ascertainment of consanguineous families in whom these "back" alleles co-existed. However this hypothesis would not explain a deficiency of affected sibs. The last explanation involves the action of mutant alleles (heterozygous or homozygous) at a second unlinked locus, which are essential for manifestation, but which do not cause disease on their own. The requirement of two pairs of unlinked recessive alleles for manifestation would give rise to a segregation ratio of 0.0625 or more, the requirement of two unlinked dominant loci would produce a segregation ratio of 0.25 and both situations would be associated with an unexpectedly low parental consanguinity rate.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed317    
    Printed44    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded57    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal